First Vita Plus Story, A STORY OF HOPE!!! 🌱🌿☘🍀🍃

First Vita Plus – A Natural Way to stay healthy 😊
First Vita Plus is your vitamin and vitality in a drink and will show you how wellness, wholeness and well-being can be within your reach!
Explore the natural wonders of our all natural health drink and get a glimpse of its wonderful goodness.
Discover how this unique and first-of-its-kind product can give you a healthy lifestyle and a revitalized body that will surely amaze you with its energy boost, added strength and natural glow.

We want to share the story of Ms. Marie Ranola 26 years of age, almost 2 months siya in coma and diagnosed with
brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM is a tangle of abnormal blood vessels connecting arteries and veins in the brain)
after drinking First Vita Plus Platinum Variant she is RECOVERING AMAZINGLY!
👉👉👉 Just see the posted PHOTOS and be SURPRISED!

FVP PLATINUM LINES
Available on DALANDAN, PINEAPPLE, GUYABANO Variants 🍊🍍🥝

★ Ano ang pinagkaiba nito sa existing variants ng First Vita Plus?
✔ No Added Sugar
✔ Recommended for terminal or serious illness/diseases
✔ Each box contains 15 sachets only
✔ Recovers and restores your body to its healthy state FAST and SAFE
✔ If GOLD Variants are 3x more potent than ORIGINAL Variants, PLATINUM Lines are far more superior when it comes to effectiveness!

★ Why TRY this Natural Health Juice? 🥃🍃
✔ Does not cure the symptoms alone unlike conventional medicine
✔ Does not harm your body since it is ALL NATURAL and NO PRESERVATIVES
✔ No contraindication (Maaring isabay sa mga gamot na iniinom)
✔ No harmful side-effects
✔ Boost and detox your IMMUNE SYSTEM (Maiiwasan/Malalabanan ang pagkakaroon ng malalang sakit)
✔ For CANCER patients, eases and lessens the painful side-effects of chemotherapy!

★ First Vita Plus PLATINUM LINES may help fight chronic illnesses because a HEALTHY and STRONG Immune System is the KEY to be DISEASE FREE LIFE:

✔ High Blood Pressure
✔ High in Cholesterol
✔ Cancer (Breast, Colon, Leukemia, Lung, Bone etc.)
✔ Chronic Kidney Disease (caused by Diabetes, Highblood)
✔ Dialysis Patients (Kidney Malfunction/Failure)
✔ Alzheimer’s disease and dementia
✔ Arthritis
✔ Asthma
✔ Diabetes
✔ Stroke
✔ Heart Disease
✔ Hypertension

ORDER NOW!

#Detox #ColonCleanse #WeightLoss #Vitamins #Fertility #Heart #Kidney #Cancer #Diabetes #Hypertension #Stroke #Organic #HealthyDrink

For more details about First Vita Plus products, contact us at:
m.me/FirstVitaPlusOfficial.PH

**TRY OUR BEST SELLING PRODUCT FIRST VITA PLUS MELON GOLD (TRYING TO GET PREGNANT? DRINK FVP MELON GOLD)**

PAANO KUMUHA NG NBI CLEARANCE ONLINE?

APPLY NBI CLEARANCE.

Do cell phones cause tumors? PAANO KUMUHA NG NBI CLEARANCE ONLINE? Paano Kumuha ng NBI Clearance? Apply NBI Clearance Online. SCROLL DOWN MO LANG,NASA IBABA ANG NBI CLEARANCE LINK Because cell phones usually are held near the head when being used, the main concern has been whether they might cause or contribute to tumors in this area, including: Malignant (cancerous) brain tumors such as gliomas Non-cancerous tumors of the brain such as meningiomas Non-cancerous tumors of the nerve connecting the brain to the ear (vestibular schwannomas, also known as acoustic neuromas) Non-cancerous tumors of the salivary glands A few studies have also looked at possible links to other types of cancer, such as skin cancer and testicular cancer. Researchers use 2 main types of studies to try to determine if something might cause cancer. Lab studies: Lab studies usually expose animals to something like RF energy to see if it causes tumors or other health problems. Researchers might also expose normal cells in a lab dish to RF energy to see if it causes the types of changes that are seen in cancer cells. It’s not always clear if the results from these types of studies will apply to humans, but lab studies allow researchers to carefully control for other factors that might affect the results and to answer some basic science questions. Studies in people: Another type of study looks at cancer rates in different groups of people. Such a study might compare the cancer rate in a group exposed to something like cell phone use to the rate in a group not exposed to it, or compare it to what the expected cancer rate would be in the general population. But sometimes it can be hard to know what the results of these studies mean, because many other factors that might affect the results are hard to account for. In most cases neither type of study provides enough evidence on its own to show if something causes cancer in people, so researchers usually look at both lab-based and human studies. What do lab studies suggest? As noted above, the RF waves given off by cell phones don’t have enough energy to damage DNA directly or to heat body tissues. Because of this, it’s not clear how cell phones might be able to cause cancer. Most studies done in the lab have supported the idea that RF waves do not cause DNA damage. Some scientists have reported that the RF waves from cell phones produce effects in human cells (in lab dishes) that might possibly help tumors grow. However, several studies in rats and mice have looked at whether RF energy might promote the development of tumors caused by other known carcinogens (cancer-causing agents). These studies did not find evidence of tumor promotion. A recent large study by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) exposed large groups of lab rats and mice to RF energy over their entire bodies for about 9 hours a day, starting before birth and continuing for up to 2 years (which is the equivalent of about 70 years for humans, according to NTP scientists). The study found an increased risk of tumors called malignant schwannomas of the heart in male rats exposed to RF radiation, as well as possible increased risks of certain types of tumors in the brain and adrenal glands. But some aspects of this study make it hard to know just how well these results might be applied to cell phone use in people. For example, there was no clear increased risk among female rats or among male or female mice in the study. The doses of RF radiation in the study were also generally higher than those used in cell phones (ranging from 1.5 W/kg to 6 W/kg in rats, and 2.5 W/kg to 10 W/kg in mice), the animals’ entire bodies were exposed, and the amount of time they were exposed was longer than most people typically spend on the phone each day. The male rats in the study exposed to RF waves also lived longer, on average, than the rats who were not exposed, for unclear reasons. Because of this, the NTP has noted that the study results cannot be directly applied to humans. Still, the results add to the evidence that cell phone signals might potentially impact human health. A recent small study in people has shown that cell phones may also have some other effects on the brain, although it’s not clear if they’re harmful. The study found that when people had an active cell phone held up to their ear for 50 minutes, brain tissues on the same side of the head as the phone used more glucose than did tissues on the other side of the brain. Glucose is a sugar that normally serves as the brain’s fuel. Glucose use goes up in certain parts of the brain when it is in use, such as when we are thinking, speaking, or moving. The possible health effect, if any, from the increase in glucose use from cell phone energy is unknown. What do studies in humans suggest? Several dozen studies have looked at possible links between cell phone use and tumors. Most of these studies have focused on brain tumors. Many of these have been case-control studies, in which patients with brain tumors (cases) were compared to people free of brain tumors (controls), in terms of their past cell phone use. These studies have had mixed results: In most studies patients with brain tumors do not report more cell phone use overall than the controls. This finding is true when all brain tumors are considered as a group, or when specific types of tumors are considered. Most studies do not show a “dose-response relationship,” which would be a tendency for the risk of brain tumors to be higher with increasing cell phone use. This would be expected if cell phone use caused brain tumors. Most studies do not show that brain tumors occur more often on the side of the head where people hold their cell phones. This might also be expected if cell phone use caused brain tumors. Some studies have found a possible link. For example, several studies published by the same research group in Sweden have reported an increased risk of tumors on the side of the head where the cell phone was held, particularly with 10 or more years of use. It is hard to know what to make of these findings because most studies by other researchers have not had the same results, and there is no overall increase in brain tumors in Sweden during the years that correspond to these reports. Three large studies deserve special mention: The INTERPHONE study The 13-country INTERPHONE study, the largest case-control study done to date, looked at cell phone use among more than 5,000 people who developed brain tumors (gliomas or meningiomas) and a similar group of people without tumors. Overall, the study found no link between brain tumor risk and the frequency of calls, longer call time, or cell phone use for 10 or more years. There was a suggestion of a possible increased risk of glioma, and a smaller suggestion of an increased risk of meningioma, in the 10% of people who used their cell phones the most. But this finding was hard to interpret because some people in the study reported implausibly high cell phone use, as well as other issues. The researchers noted that the shortcomings of the study prevented them from drawing any firm conclusions, and that more research was needed. Another part of the INTERPHONE study compared more than 1,000 people with acoustic neuromas to more than 2,000 people without tumors, who served as matched controls. As with gliomas and meningiomas, there was no overall link between cell phone use and acoustic neuromas. There was again a suggestion of a possible increased risk in the 10% of people who used their cell phones the most, but this was hard to interpret because some people reported implausibly high cell phone use, as well as other issues. The Danish cohort study A large, long-term study has been comparing all of the people in Denmark who had a cell phone subscription between 1982 and 1995 (about 400,000 people) to those without a subscription to look for a possible increase in brain tumors. The most recent update of the study followed people through 2007. Cell phone use, even for more than 13 years, was not linked with an increased risk of brain tumors, salivary gland tumors, or cancer overall, nor was there a link with any brain tumor subtypes or with tumors in any location within the brain. This type of study (following a large group of people going forward in time and not relying on people’s memories about cell phone use) is generally thought to be stronger than a case-control study. But this study also has some drawbacks. First, it is based only on whether or not people had a cell phone subscription at the time. It didn’t measure how often these people used their phones (if at all), or if people who didn’t have a subscription used someone else’s phone. There are also limits as to how well this study might apply to people using cell phones today. For example, while the cell phones used at the time of the study tended to require more power than modern cell phones, people also probably used the phones quite a bit less than people use their phones today. The Million Women Study A large prospective (forward-looking) study of nearly 800,000 women in the UK examined the risk of developing brain tumors over a 7-year period in relation to self-reported cell phone use at the start of the study. This study found no link between cell phone use and brain tumors overall or several common brain tumor subtypes, but it did find a possible link between long-term cell phone use and acoustic neuromas. All studies done so far have limitations In summary, most studies of people published so far have not found a link between cell phone use and the development of tumors. However, these studies have had some important limitations that make them unlikely to end the controversy about whether cell phone use affects cancer risk. First, studies have not yet been able to follow people for very long periods of time. When tumors form after a known cancer-causing exposure, it often takes decades for them to develop. Because cell phones have been in widespread use for only about 20 years in most countries, it is not possible to rule out future health effects that have not yet appeared. Second, cell phone usage is constantly changing. People are using their cell phones much more than they were even 10 years ago, and the phones themselves are very different from what was used in the past. This makes it hard to know if the results of studies looking at cell phone use in years past would still apply today. Third, most of the studies published so far have focused on adults, rather than children. (One case-control study looking at children and teens did not find a significant link to brain tumors, but the small size of the study limited its power to detect modest risks.) Cell phone use is now widespread even among younger children. It is possible that if there are health effects, they might be more pronounced in children because their bodies might be more sensitive to RF energy. Another concern is that children’s lifetime exposure to the energy from cell phones will be greater than adults’, who started using them at a later age. Finally, the measurement of cell phone use in most studies has been crude. Most have been case-control studies, which have relied on people’s memories about their past cell phone use. In these types of studies, it can be hard to interpret any possible link between cancer and an exposure. People with cancer are often looking for a possible reason for it, so they may sometimes (even subconsciously) recall their phone usage differently than people without cancer. With these limitations in mind, it is important that the possible risk of cell phone exposure continue to be researched using strong study methods, especially with regard to use by children and longer-term use. What do expert agencies say? Several national and international agencies study different exposures and substances in the environment to determine if they can cause cancer. (Something that causes cancer or helps cancer grow is called a carcinogen.) The American Cancer Society looks to these organizations to evaluate the risks based on evidence from laboratory and human research studies. Based on the available evidence, some of these expert agencies have evaluated the cancer-causing potential of cell phones and RF waves. In general, they agree that the evidence of a possible link is limited, and more research is needed to look at possible long-term effects. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is part of the World Health Organization (WHO). Its major goal is to identify causes of cancer. The IARC has classified RF fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” based on limited evidence of a possible increase in risk for brain tumors among cell phone users, and inadequate evidence for other types of cancer. (For more information on the IARC classification system, see Known and Probable Human Carcinogens.) The other main agencies that classify cancer-causing exposures (carcinogens), including the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Toxicology Program (NTP), have not formally classified cell phones as to their cancer-causing potential. However, several other agencies have commented on the possible risks. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which regulates the safety of radiation-emitting devices such as cell phones in the United States: “Based on our ongoing evaluation of this issue, the totality of the available scientific evidence continues to not support adverse health effects in humans caused by exposures at or under the current radiofrequency energy exposure limits. We believe the existing safety limits for cell phones remain acceptable for protecting the public health.” According to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC): “There is no scientific evidence that proves that wireless phone usage can lead to cancer or a variety of other problems, including headaches, dizziness or memory loss. However, organizations in the United States and overseas are sponsoring research and investigating claims of possible health effects related to the use of wireless telephones.” According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): “At this time we do not have the science to link health problems to cell phone use. Scientific studies are underway to determine whether cell phone use may cause health effects.” According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), which is conducting studies of the possible health effects of cell phones: “Current scientific evidence has not conclusively linked cell phone use with any adverse health problems, but more research is needed.” According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI): “Studies thus far have not shown a consistent link between cell phone use and cancers of the brain, nerves, or other tissues of the head or neck. More research is needed because cell phone technology and how people use cell phones have been changing rapidly.” Do cell phones cause any other health problems? A few other health concerns have been raised about cell phone use. One has been whether the RF waves from cell phones might interfere with medical devices such as heart pacemakers. According to the FDA, cell phones should not pose a major risk for the vast majority of pacemaker wearers. Still, people with pacemakers may want to take some simple precautions to help ensure that their cell phones don’t cause a problem, such as not putting the phone in a shirt pocket close to the pacemaker. Several studies have found that people who use cell phones while driving are more likely to be in car accidents. It is not clear if hands-free phones are safer than hand-held phones when it comes to driving. Can I lower my exposure to RF waves from cell phones? It is not clear at this time that RF waves from cell phones cause harmful health effects in people, but studies now being done should give a clearer picture of the possible health effects in the future. Until then, there are several things that people who are concerned about RF waves can do to limit their exposure. Use the speaker mode on the phone or a hands-free device such as a corded or cordless earpiece. This moves the antenna away from your head, which decreases the amount of RF waves that reach the head. Corded earpieces emit virtually no RF waves (although the phone itself still emits small amounts of RF waves that can reach parts of the body if close enough, such as on the waist or in a pocket). Bluetooth® earpieces have an SAR value of around 0.001 watts/kg (less than one thousandth the SAR limit for cell phones as set by the FDA and FCC). Texting instead of talking on the phone may be another option to reduce your exposure. But it may not be a good option in some situations, especially if you are driving. For safety reasons, it is especially important to limit or avoid the use of cell phones while driving. Limit your (and your children’s) cell phone use. This is one of the most obvious ways to limit your exposure to RF waves from cell phones. You may want to use your cell phone only for shorter conversations, or use it only when a conventional phone is not available. Parents who are concerned about their children’s exposure can limit how much time they spend on the phone. Some people might consider choosing a phone with a low SAR value. Different models of phones can give off different levels of RF waves. But as noted above, according to the FCC the SAR value is not always a good indicator of a person’s exposure to RF waves during normal cell phone use. One way to get information on the SAR level for a specific phone model is to visit the phone maker’s website. The FCC has links to some of these sites here: www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/specific-absorption-rate-sar-cellular-telephones. If you know the FCC identification (ID) number for a phone model (which can often be found somewhere on the phone or in the user manual), you can also go to the following web address: www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid. On this page, you will see instructions for entering the FCC ID number.

***PAANO KUMUHA NG NBI CLEARANCE ONLINE?**** Paano Kumuha ng NBI Clearance? Apply NBI Clearance Online. ****

Computer Radiation: Excessive Exposure to Computer Radiation and Heat

In significant enough doses, computer radiation can have many negative effects on the body. This can range from skin burnsand rashes to fertility issues with both men and women, DNA fragmentation (irreversible changes to the genetic code), and other serious health conditions like cancerous tumors.

The dangers from computer radiation come from both thermal and non-thermal biological effects of low-energy non-ionizing radiation. This stems from the computer’s internal functions, which emit extremely low frequencies (ELF) and WiFior Bluetooth connections, which emit radio frequencies (RF).

Exposure to heat radiation from computers poses a significant danger if it is excessive.

As previously stated, prolonged use of laptop computers is common, and therefore dangers to one’s health from computer radiation are quite real.

Among the biggest risks is the possible damage to fertility if laptops are placed on a male’s lap for hours per day. Extended exposure to thermal computer radiation may not only decrease sperm count and sperm motility, but it can also cause severe irritation of the skin.

Exposure to large amounts of electromagnetic radiation can also cause meaningful damage to healthy cells and chromosome damage. Dangers posed by computer radiation come from excess exposure to electromagnetic radiation and thermal computer radiation from internal computer components.

Although there are competing studies as to how serious the dangers may be, tech users can never be too careful. In order to protect oneself from possible negative side effects of computer radiation, there are effective solutions such as a computer radiation shield that helps to minimize possible health damage.

Today, Computers are being used in almost every field. These have become an important part of our lives. There is no doubt that its versatility has not only changed our way of thinking but has also accelerated the rate development many times. But, do you know how risky the computer radiation can be for our eyes, heart and other body organs?

In this article, I have put some efforts to let us know the risks of computer radiation as well as some easy and effective ways to be on a safer side!

What is Computer Radiation?

To make the concept of computer radiations more clear, I would like to introduce you all with Electromagnetic radiation or EM radiations or simply called ‘EMR’. Electromagnetic energy is a term used for describing all the different kinds of energies which are released into space by stars (for example, The Sun). Radio Waves, TV waves, short waves, microwaves, heat (infrared radiation), light, X-rays, Gamma rays, including UV-light that also causes Sunburns comes into Electromagnetic energies. Even a power line, a broadcast tower, or any other electric device including Computer emits a considerable amount of electromagnetic radiation, which in simpler words is known as Computer Radiation. This type of radiation emitted from Computers, TVs and other electrical and electronic devices is also known as Extremely Low Frequency or ELF.
Microwave radiation is another type of dangerous EM radiation found near computers and other electronic devices. These waves are used for providing radio communication between equipment that needs wireless networking, such as computers, printers, scanner, modem, routers and other wireless devices.

How to stay safe online The internet is great fun but it does have dangers and we want you to be safe online. When you join a chatroom you’ll find people are very friendly but the person you are talking to might not always be who they say they are. People can pretend to be your age and unfortunately there have been cases where adults have pretended to be teenagers and lured young people into meeting them in dangerous situations. Some of these cases have ended up in court in the UK.

Danger signs

If the person tries to insist on having your address or phone number
If the person emails you pictures which make you feel uncomfortable and which you would not want to show to anyone else
If the person wants to keep their chats with you secret
If the person tells you that you will get into trouble if you tell an adult what has been going on
If the person emails you pictures which make you feel uncomfortable and which you would not want to show to anyone else
If the person wants you to email them pictures of yourself or use a webcam in a way which makes you feel uncomfortable
If the person shares information with you and tells you not to tell anyone else about it
If the person wants to meet you and tells you not to let anyone know
If you find any of these danger signs it’s important that you tell your parents or another adult.

How to be safe online?Never post or trade personal pictures. Never reveal personal information, such as address, phone number, or school name or location. Use only a screen name and don’t share passwords (other than with parents). Never agree to get together in person with anyone met online without parent approval and/or supervision.

Be Safe Online

Stage 4 Colon cancer, malalang sakit. Hindi ko po akalain na mangyayare sakin ito, kung mababalik lang ang panahon para mapigilan ang pagkakasakit ko nito, nawalan ako ng disiplina sa katawan, na adik ako sa Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 😢😢😢, to the point na hindi na ako kumakain at natutulog, tutulog ng umaga mga 9 to 10am magdamag po un tapos gigising ako gabi na mga 6 to 8pm dun palang ako kakain, tapos laro na ulit, tapos mahina pa ako sa tubig, hanggang sa nakaramdam na Ako ng di maganda sa katawan ko, ganon naging cycle ng buhay ko. ngaun ito ang nangyare sakin. Kaya sa lahat po ng bagay dapat tlaga hindi nasosobrahan, dahil di nyo na mababalik ang pangyayare! Wala napo pag asa na maalis pa ang tumor ko sa rectum kasi lumala napo, hindi na pwedeng galawin ang tumor kasi affected napo ung pantog at gal blader ko. Pag ginalaw pa mamamatay po ako dretso sa operating room. Nagpapasalamat ako sa mga doctors ko kasi ginawa po nila lahat ng kanilang makakaya. kasing laki napo ng kamao ung tumor ko 😭😭😭.. tanging paraan nlng po ay magpa radiation po ako para umimpis ang bukol ko. Medyo malaki laki lang po ang kailangan ko na halaga. 😢😭🙏🏻

Nahiling lang po ako sa may mga mabubuting puso pashare po plsss 😭😭😭😭😭😭 . Lugod po ako nagmamakaawa para po makarating sa mga taong may mabubuting puso na handa din po magbigay kahit kaunti na halaga e lugod ko pong tatanggapin ng boo ko pong puso para po sa aking chemo radiation.

GCASH : 09272826919